RESEARCH PROPOSAL
“The deficiency of responsibility theory of ”
Contents
Background
Literature Review
Research and Methodology
- Analysis of research of theorists
- Interpretation of matters in
Conclusion
Timescale
s
Background
General introduction to the deficiency of social responsibility of
From the middle of twentieth century, of press has replaced liberalism gradually because of limitation of liberalism and issues in practice of media. Severely, social responsibility theory of press is not a separated theory but an evolvement conformation of liberalism. It is reformation to traditional liberalism of media. In the middle of nineteenth century, liberty and indulging of mass media had deviated from original thought distillation of liberalism, which means resource of information had monopolized by minority. Free market place of ideas is existed no more. Then free speech had been surrendered itself. And purpose of producing and transmitting information mainly is used to serve for business benefit but not public advantage so that this would infract other holders of rights. Liberty and Responsible Media, which published in 1947, and Freedom of the Press, wrote by William E Hocking, they are considered the classic documents in social responsibility theory. The report is indicated that some risk of liberty of media come from movement of economic structure in media, some are from industrial systems in modern society. And in some extent, some people worked the risk that has controlled the press but they have no anticipation to demands of press for modern society or can’t take in hand their responsibility. (Alison Alexander,Jarice Hanson. 1991)
Brief literature review - Social responsibility theory
Bibliography:
Alison Alexander,Jarice Hanson. (1991). Taking Sides—Clashing Views on Controversial Issues in Mass Media and Society.The Dushkin Publishing Group,Inc, p. 112.
Carey, J. W(1999). In Defense of Public Journalism. In T. L. p.438.
Glasser, (1999). The Idea of Public Journalism. New York: Guilford Press, p.768.
Hass, T. (1999).What’s “Public” About Public Journalism. CommunicationTheory, p. 346-364.
Josh Silver. (2008).The Future of Media Doesn't Belong to Murdoch; It Belongs to Us. Huffington Post, p. 348.
Jay Rosen. (1996). Getting the Connections Right—public journalism and the Trouble in the Press. A Twentieth Century Fund , p 15.
John C. Merrill. (1989). The Dialectic in Journalism. Louisiana State University Press, p .97-98.
Leonard Witt. (2004). Do we need a name change? .Civic Journalism Interest Group News.
Lambeth,E. (1998). Public Journalism as a democratic practice. Guilford Press, p.257.
Merritt, D. (1995). Public Journalism and Public Life: Why Telling the News Is Not Enough. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum,
研究计划书
“责任理论”的不足
内容
背景
文献综述
研究和方法论
- 理论家的研究分析
- 解读事宜
结论
时间刻度
Ş
背景
缺乏社会责任感的一般介绍
记者从20世纪中期，已经取代了自由主义逐渐自由主义和媒体在实践中的问题，因为限制。严重，记者的社会责任理论是不是一个分离的理论，而是一种演变构象自由主义。这是改革传统的自由主义的媒体。在19世纪中期，大众媒体的自由和放纵偏离从原以为蒸馏自由主义，这意味着少数人所垄断的信息资源。自由市场的想法是不存在的。然后言论自由已经被放弃了。生产和传递信息的目的主要是为商业利益而不是公共利益，使这将侵害其他持有人的权利。自由和负责任的媒体，出版于1947年，新闻自由，写了，威廉e霍金，他们被认为是经典的社会责任理论中的文件。该报告表示，媒体的自由，有些风险来自媒体经济结构变动的，有些是从工业系统在现代社会。在一定程度上，一些人工作的风险控制的新闻，但他们没有按现代社会的需求预期或不能拿在手上，他们的责任。 （汉森Jarice艾莉森·亚历山大，1991）
简要文献回顾 - 社会责任理论
参考书目：
艾莉森·亚历山大，汉森Jarice。 （1991）。以侧面冲突的次数就有争议的问题，大众传媒与社会。杜什金出版集团，公司，第。 112。
凯里，J. W（1999）。在公共新闻学的防御。 T. L. p.438。
格拉瑟（1999年）。公共新闻的理念。纽约：吉尔福德出版社，p.768。
海思，T.（1999）。什么是“公共的”关于公共新闻。 CommunicationTheory。 346-364。
乔希银。 （2008年）。媒体的未来不属于默多克，它是属于我们的。赫芬顿邮报。 348。
杰伊·罗森。 （1996）。获得正确的连接的公共新闻和新闻的麻烦。二十世纪的基金，第15页。
约翰C.美林。 （1989）。新闻中的辩证法。路易斯安那州立大学出版社，第.97-98。
伦纳德·威特。 （2004年）。我们需要一个名称的变化？公民新闻业利息集团新闻。
兰贝斯，E. （1998年）。公共新闻作为一个民主的做法。吉尔福德出版社，第257页。
梅里特，D.（1995）。公共新闻和公共生活：为什么说新闻是不够的。新泽西州希尔斯代尔：Erlbaum
