浏览: 日期:2020-05-27
The report analyzes the performance of 30 non-financial IPO’s, floated in the Alternative investment market (AIM) during the period of Jan 2002- Dec 2004, the main tasks undertaken were First, to define a portfolio of 30 IPO’s that were floated in the given time period. Second, calculating the initial returns of the selected IPO’s and testing them. Third, deriving a 24 month return of the same securities and thereafter testing those returns, in both the circumstances (second & third) the return is tested by deriving the basic descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation etc.) on the data collected and hence discussing and commenting on the same
The sample of IPO’s that our group has selected is basically refined from Jan 2002 - Dec 2003. The criteria taken into consideration while selecting the IPO’s was to make a portfolio that would cover different sectors of the market, basically diversifying and defining the movements of these securities in the AIM market more precisely; the sample is divided into 4 major industrial sectors
The IPO’s that we have selected were floated in the market either by placing or by an open offer. The table given below shows the name of the companies that our group has selected with a detailed synopsis of the companies selected, illustrating the data on the Initial Public Offerings. (Date of issue, market capitalization, issue price etc.)
For computing the initial return of the IPO’s we have taken into account the issue price of the securities and the price after 12 months from the issue also bearing in mind if any dividend is paid out during this period. The initial return formula that we have used has 3 variables which can be solved for;
Initial Return = (P1 – P0) +div
P0
Where,
P0 = Issue Price.
P1 = Price after 12 months.
Div = Dividend paid during this period.
We can see that for the 12 month period considered, the pharmaceutical & the biotechnology sector is showing a bearish trend giving negative returns with DDD Group with the lowest at -86.69%, the gold mining and the other minerals extracting sector is giving a positive return during this period of 12 months, with African Eagle Resources showing the maximum positive return of 283% in one year, the performance of the general finance sector is bullish with almost all the companies giving a positive return. Also observed is that most of the companies in the portfolio have not declared any dividends after there first financial year, therefore in most of the cases dividend paid out is taken
The issue price for Caledon Resources Plc & Healthcare Enterprise Group could not be found out therefore it was not possible to calculate there initial returns. For all the other stocks refer to Table .01 and the histogram (fig. 01) displaying the returns. For an extensive reference and guidance to how the returns were calculated refer to Appendix 02 (returns).
Security |
Return % |
Security |
Return % |
COBRA BIO-MANUFACTURING |
-10.75 |
CUSTOMVIS |
-24.17 |
YM BIOSCIENCES INC |
-21.78 |
MICAP |
9.09 |
CYPROTEX |
-70.68 |
HEALTHCARE ENTERPRISE GROUP |
|
SINCLAIR PHARMA |
11.08 |
DIPFORD GROUP |
10.71 |
PETER HAMBRO MINING |
1.53 |
LIGHTHOUSE GROUP |
-33.75 |
HIGHLAND GOLD MINING |
55.26 |
VANTIS |
-3.89 |
MONTERRICO METALS |
35.18 |
ULTIMATE FINANCE GROUP |
-37.5 |
JUBILEE PLATINUM |
25 |
VOLVERE |
75 |
CALEDON RESOURCES PLC |
JUDGES CAPITAL |
36.842 |
|
GMA RESOURCES |
76.67 |
CANISP |
54.54 |
AFRICAN EAGLE RESOURCES |
283.33 |
DDD GROUP |
-86.69 |
TRANS-SIBERIAN GOLD |
-16 |
PILAT MEDIA GLOBAL |
-7.5 |
ADVANCED MEDICAL SOLUTIONS |
8.23 |
MANPOWER SOFTWARE |
-25 |
1ST DENTAL LABORATORIES |
-12.03 |
FIRST DERIVATIVES |
46.5 |
DAWMED SYSTEMS |
22 |
TOUCHSTONE GROUP |
-1.25 |
For testing the return, we have used some basic descriptive statistical tools such as;
Mean: The mean is the "standard" average and is defined as, mean is the sum of the observations divided by the number of observations.
Where,
Xi= observations (i=1, 2, 3……., n)
n=number of observations
The mean is the arithmetic average of a set of values, or distribution; however, for skewed distributions, the mean is not necessarily the same as the middle value (median).
For example, mean income is skewed upwards by a small number of people with very large incomes, so that the majority has an income lower than the mean. By contrast, the median income is the level at which half the population is below and half is above.
For example, the arithmetic mean of 34, 27, 45, 55, 22, 34 (six values) is; (34+27+45+55+22+34)/6 = 217/6 ≈ 36.167.
Standard Deviation: is a measure of the spread of its values. The standard deviation is usually denoted with the letter σ (lower case sigma). It is defined as the square root of the variance.
To understand standard deviation, keep in mind that variance is the average of the squared differences between data points and the mean. Variance is tabulated in units squared. Standard deviation, being the square root of that quantity, therefore measures the spread of data about the mean, measured in the same units as the data.
Stated more formally, the standard deviation is the root mean square (RMS) deviation of values from their arithmetic mean. Below given is the formula for standard deviation.
Where,
Xi=random variable (i=1, 2, 3…n)
X = mean of the observations
n= number of observations
Median: A median is described as the number separating the higher half of a sample, a population, or a probability distribution, from the lower half. The median of a finite list of numbers can be found by arranging all the observations from lowest value to highest value and picking the middle one. If there is an even number of observations, the median is not unique, so one often takes the mean of the two middle values.
The table given below shows the mean standard deviation and other descriptive statistical measures of the IPO’s, the analysis is divided into three options, option A, B & C. these option are considered generally to define the data more accurately and to test the data more efficiently.
Option A |
Option B |
Option C |
|
Mean |
14.29 % |
4.32% |
10.96% |
St dev |
0.6546 |
0.3952 |
0.3266 |
Highest |
283.33% |
76.67% |
76.67% |
Lowest |
-86.69% |
-86.69% |
-33.75% |
Median |
4.89% |
1.54% |
8.24% |
Count |
28 |
27 |
25 |
Option A: Takes into account the initial return of all the thirty companies and thereby calculating the mean that comes to 14.29% and a standard deviation of 65.46%, this tells us that there is high degree of dispersion between the returns of the securities, also we can see that the analysis given a median of 4.89% which is relatively small. This is due to an outlier (i.e. African Eagle Resources) generating a return of 283.33%. (Shown in fig 01(a))
Option B: Therefore, undertaking the analysis once more after removing the outlier (refer fig A) we get a more exact result; it can be now observed that the mean has relatively diminished and the result is less dispersed and shows less variance. Also we can see that the data is now more into the range with the maximum return of 76.67% and the minimum return of -86.69%. The count of the data i.e. the number of the observations has lessened by 1. Also the median is fairly close to the mean
Option C: The analysis of data in option c is done, to make sure the calculated statistical information was correct and accurate, what we did in this step was we made the data more defined by deleting 2 extreme negative returns and the positive outlier, therefore keeping the range of the return less than -35% and a max of 76.67%.what we concluded was that the result was more accurate with mean and the median close to each other and a less varied dispersion was obtained of 32%
Hence we can conclude that the initial return on the AIM had a dispersion of 32% with a portfolio of companies from the selected 4 sectors and a rational investment in the market could reap a return of at least 11%. Also we can observe that mean and median are relatively close to each other giving us a normal distribution.
For calculating the long-term return of 24 months for the IPO’s selected, the data taken into account is the annualized share price of 2006 and price of the stock as on 25th march 2008 [Refer to appendix 02 (returns)], also keeping in mind the dividend paid during this period. The method used to calculate the long term return is similar to the formula used for calculating the initial return that is.
Initial Return = (P1 – P0) +div
P0
Where,
P0 = Annualized price for 2006
P1 = Price as on 25th march 2008
Div = Dividend paid during the 24 month period
The figure shows the histogram of the returns produced by the IPO’s in the given 24 month period ,it is observed from the results, that the 24 month returns scarcely correlate with the initial returns of the IPO’s selected. African eagle resources the highest gainer initially has now produced negative returns of 19%, the biotechnology sector is still showing a bearish trend, the top gainer for the 24 month period selected is the ‘First Derivative’ generating a return of 146% , the biggest loser is the ‘Healthcare Enterprise Group’ generating -94.29% returns.
We can also say that during this period most of the securities in the AIM have generated negative returns with a some exceptional outliers showing a positive returns and a few with an outstanding return. In our selected portfolio around 19 securities out of 30 are generating negative returns.
Security |
Return % |
Security |
Return % |
COBRA BIO-MANUFACTURING |
-58.74% |
CUSTOMVIS |
77.45% |
YM BIOSCIENCES INC |
-77.59% |
MICAP |
-77.32% |
CYPROTEX |
-3827% |
HEALTHCARE ENTERPRISE GROUP |
-94.29% |
SINCLAIR PHARMA |
-70.46% |
DIPFORD GROUP |
-87.80% |
PETER HAMBRO MINING |
6.26% |
LIGHTHOUSE GROUP |
21.33% |
HIGHLAND GOLD MINING |
20.94% |
VANTIS |
-22.01% |
MONTERRICO METALS |
-53.22% |
ULTIMATE FINANCE GROUP |
-73.68% |
JUBILEE PLATINUM |
7.86% |
VOLVERE |
-8.93% |
CALEDON RESOURCES PLC |
32.39% |
JUDGES CAPITAL |
19.49% |
GMA RESOURCES |
2.99% |
CANISP |
-88.89% |
AFRICAN EAGLE RESOURCES |
-19.51% |
DDD GROUP |
-38.30% |
TRANS-SIBERIAN GOLD |
-22.67% |
PILAT MEDIA GLOBAL |
-54.60% |
ADVANCED MEDICAL SOLUTIONS |
105.45% |
MANPOWER SOFTWARE |
127.78% |
1ST DENTAL LABORATORIES |
-21.83% |
FIRST DERIVATIVES |
146.41% |
DAWMED SYSTEMS |
-38.89% |
TOUCHSTONE GROUP |
-27.67% |
Once again we have used the statistical tools to test the long term return of the IPO’s, same measures have been taken for deriving the mean and standard deviation of the calculated return in the Option A accounts for all the 30 companies, as could be observed the mean return of the portfolio was negative i.e. -13.5% with high spread of 63%. The range of the data in this option was big with the highest return of 146.41% and the lowest return of – 94.39%, the analysis seemed to be vague.
Therefore we run the analysis again (Option B) removing the high positive return of 146%, we found out that the mean return experience a greater fall reducing to -19% the dispersion lessens but is still significant, the median in both the cases is around -20% which do not link with the mean, thus we go for Option C that is, further removing a high positive outlier and hence obtaining a more precise outcome with a mean and median of -25% and a less dispersed data set, the count of the observations in this option is 28 that is 2 less than the given data set.
The tests of the returns show that the AIM during the 24 month period is demonstrating a bearish trend with certain stocks trying to go against the trend, the overall return that a balanced portfolio could generate out the market for the given period would be negative.
In our study we have also collected the data on the return of equity (ROE) for the individual IPO’s (refer to appendix 02) these returns are the annualized returns for the securities (as on 25th march 2008) the data collected is from official website of Reuters (link given in the references) we have used these returns to correlate the 24 month long-term returns that we have calculated correlating the ROE with the 24 month return calculated we get a correlation of 0.63 this shows that the 24 month returns and the return on equity link with each other (the correlation analysis is an additional analysis that our group has undertaken, this examination has further helped to verify the accuracy of the results).
The 30 IPO’s selected are some of the high risk equities , an investment in these securities can yield unpredicted returns both positive and negative, to argue this point refer to the beta’s exhibited in the appendix 0, the beta shows how volatile is the share price to the movement of the overall market, a non volatile stock should have a beta near to 1, but the computed beta’s show that there are certain securities that even show a beta of more than 3 which proves that the movement of these stocks are extremely volatile and hence the returns are uncertain.