这项assignment提供了将outsourcing概念、工具和技术应用到组织中的机会，从而证明了批判性评估outsourcing决策的能力。任务必须：　　1.明确描述outsourcing活动
　　2.演示公司如何管理outsourcing活动
　　3.批判性评价影响公司outsourcing决策的因素
　　4.评估公司outsourcing决策的战略和运营影响。
　　该任务提供了将Supply Chain概念、工具和技术应用于组织(公共或私营部门)的机会，并在这方面展示了批判性评估组织Supply Chain战略的能力。
　　任务必须：
　　清楚地描述组织的Supply Chain战略，
　　展示公司如何在更广泛的业务和组织背景下管理Supply Chain，
　　批判性地评价当前和未来影响公司Supply Chain配置的因素，
　　评估公司Supply Chain方法的战略和运营影响。
　　执行摘要
　　引言，其中应包括对内部和外部背景的讨论
　　任务目标问题分析
　　可行建议的建议或选项
　　对任何建议进行批判性分析，其中应包括以下内容的讨论：
　　替代方案及其相对优势、潜在障碍和问题
　　可持续Supply Chain
　　供应商管理库存
　　Supply Chain整合障碍
　　信息技术
　　关键绩效指标
　　Supply Chain经理的角色
　　全球化
　　Supply Chain的战略契合
　　Supply Chain中的协作或冲突
　　Supply Chain系统集成
　　医疗Supply Chain
　　优化Supply Chain绩效
　　整合服务Supply Chain
　　为案例使用适当数量的工具或框架。
　　介绍/使用工具无需详细解释“它们”。
　　不需要成本数字表(汇总)
　　向组织的高级管理层汇报。
　　通过向管理层过渡影响(基于证据)确定的区域逻辑流。
　　任何选择都要和风险等一起解释清楚。
　　提出的解决方案应该是合理的
　　要求有清晰的商务英语和参考资料。
　　在文本和最终参考文献中使用哈佛格式(大约15–20就足够了)
　　Supply Chain
　　一份3000字的report格式
　　Supply Chain中的问题
　　提交2014年1月第2周
　　管理报告的样式
　　The Assignment Report
　　The individual report should be no more than 3000 words in length and should normally contain the following elements:
　　1. Executive Summary
　　2. Introduction, which should include a discussion of the internal and external context of the organisation.
　　3. Analysis of the supply chain issue within the organisation addressing the 4 points outlined above
　　4. Proposal(s) or options for workable recommendation(s) to respond to any supply chain issues.
　　5. Critical analysis of any recommendation(s)that should include a discussion of:
　　a. Alternative approaches and their relative merits
　　b. Potential barriers, trade offs and problems to the success of any implementation
　　GUIDANCE NOTES
　　The report should address the following learning outcomes within the context of the selected organisation:

Learning outcomes By the end of the module, a successful student should be able to:
1	Demonstrate a critical understanding of supply chain processes and supply chain integration.
2	Critically analyse the application of innovative technologies for globalising supply chain networks.
3	Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of different types of organisations global supply chains across industry sectors.
4	Demonstrate a critical awareness of issues and concerns associated with managing global supply chains.

　　The report will be assessed on the basis of:
　　· Depth and relevance of research,
　　· Synthesis and evaluation of data,
　　· Application, analysis and understanding of appropriate concepts,
　　· A clear, professional and well-presented report.
　　You should make sure that you are fully aware of the School's policy on plagiarism. You should be aware that you cannot later claim that you did not know the rules and regulations; like all of us working at Sussex, you must make yourself familiar with them
　　Assessment criteria

Category	Mark	Check List	Description
High Distinction	80 +	Critically reflects on established literature, empirical research and theories underpinning supply chain management. Shows evidence of appropriate, extensive and intensive data collection and analysis. Well researched, written and argued in a compelling manner. Extensive research-level references. New insights emerge from the reading of research or student’s own experiences.	The report demonstrates a mastery of the subject that goes well beyond basic reading to critically explore alternative perspectives. The analysis presented is well developed, complete and coherent, and is written in a compelling manner. Perhaps most importantly, an 80+ piece of report is characterized by a spark of creativity, or by new ideas and insights that emerge from the student’s reading and experience.
Distinction	70 – 79	Excellent knowledge of supply chain configuration issues. Extensive and appropriate use of a wide range of literature. Evidence of extensive or intensive data collection and analysis. Evidence of a critical understanding of theories and practice. Demonstrates a clear understanding and is able to present a logical and cogent argument.	The report demonstrates excellent understanding of the subject that has been gained through a thorough critical analysis of themes and issues.  It draws effectively on the relevant literature and concepts to build a comprehensive and cohesive analysis.  Persuasive reasoning backed up by appropriate illustrative examples.
Merit	60 – 69	Good knowledge of the supply chain management issues. Uses a good range of literature including refereed journals. Evidence of appropriate data collection and analysis. Logically structured and argued with the beginnings of a critical understanding of the business issue.	The report demonstrates proficient understanding of the subject gained from reporting with key sources. Major themes and debates in the extant literature are recognized and are at least referred to if not taken up completely throughout the assessment.
Pass	50 – 59	Shows a basic understanding of supply chain issues and concepts. Uses a limited range of literature including some refereed journals. Shows some evidence of basic data collection and analysis. Overall is descriptive with some development of an argument but lacking any depth and critical reflection.	The report demonstrates a basic competence in the subject. It draws on some relevant literature, but provides only a limited critical analysis of this material. Examples are used, but without a critical, analytical context  The analysis presented has some gaps. Report of this grade is characterized by sufficient coverage of the subject, but unsophisticated understanding and analysis.
Marginal Fail	40 – 49	There is a credible, although insufficient, attempt to cover all components of the assessment. Has read some literature but demonstrates only limited understanding and application of the concepts. The investigation and analysis falls short of pass standard. Descriptive in style, poor analytical structure, lacking focus and has no clear narrative thread.	The report demonstrates only a limited degree of competence in the subject. It has some sense of academic debate and/or rational analysis. There is a tendency towards reportage rather than any form of interpretation. Report of this grade is characterized by just acceptable comprehension in all elements, but the report could be improved to achieve a pass grade if the student puts in sufficient effort
Fail	0 – 39	A major problem in one or more significant areas: literature, methodology, language, etc. Clear lack of sufficient reading and use of references. Fails to extend beyond concepts and readings already taught and examined elsewhere. Poorly designed and superficial analysis. Analysis is incoherent and/or inconsistent.	The report demonstrates a lack of understanding of the subject There are significant gaps in the interpretation of literature and relevant concepts, and the reasoning presented is flawed, inconsistent, contradictory, or incoherent. Unacceptable report is characterized by incompleteness and inadequate comprehension.